Help Wanted
Users Online
NoneUser Menu
User Login
Exploitation of the Contributers by N4G
- Saturday, 05 September 2009
N4G over the years has grown into a incredibly prosperous and successful site, This is due to the excellent work of the community which brings forth the content that drives the visitation to the site every day, and it is well known that this site now makes hundreds of thousands of dollars a year in advertising revenue for its owners and the staff and contributors.
How is this revenue created? it is created entirely by the labour and efforts of the contributors of this site. Without the contributor class, this site would not gain the wealth or the popularity that it gains today. This site would be dead in the water, and so would be the few people who are really profiting off of this site.
But who is the driving source of this revenue? it is not the owners of the site and its staff, who's efforts in the past few years have been comparitively miniscule to the top 10 contributers who have contributed countless tens of thousands of articles and kept this site alive and breathing with content, controversy and debate which has only lined the coffers of the elite and ruling classes of N4G.
It is a simple fact of life that labour is the source of all wealth and that this is certainly clear on N4G which solely relies on contributors to earn its bread and butter.
So why is it when the site is earning over $1000 a day that contributors like Bloodmask, Skynidas and Cyrus only get paid a few hundred dollars a month?? if the site earned $30,000 in revenue a month, and lets say $20,000 of it was profit, why is it that the contributors are only actually earning 5% of revenues while the elite on N4G get to have the 95%??
Why is is that these members who have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars and tens of thousands of hours of labour to this site, much more time than the staff and elite on N4G who actually profit off of their labour do not get paid more and aren't allowed to have a bigger role and say in the site?? the way that these members are treated and then shunned from being allowed to have a more prominent role and more power in the community while gladly accepting the revenue they earn for you is frankly disgusting.
A comparable analogy would be the serfs of feudal times who had worked hard to produce a successful harvest had the landlord come along once a month and take 95% of their crops away from them, only allowing them to continue on subsistence level and not allowing them any rights or any power over their own affairs.
This has gotten to a point where it is disgusting, far worse than the type of capitalist exploitaiton we see in countries like China.
I don't expect the elite who run this site to ever give up all their money and profit that they have earned from people like Bloodmask and Skynidas over the years, or even to give up the majority of it. To think that they would is laughable as it has never been in the power of the ruling classes to ever give up what is fair.
But what is reasonable is that if these contributors actually earned more money every month for their hard work than what they are earning now. It would be fair to see their compensation double at least (in my opinion it should quadruple) as this is what they deserve for continuing to keep N4G alive and successful.
Furthermore, these people deserve more rights and status in the community. It is sad that they are continually exploited, looked over and ignored by the staff on this site for simple things like moderation of the main site or of the forums, or some greater editorial role in ensuring that quality news stories are created every day.
This doesn't really concern me since I don't earn a cent from contributing or from this site, but I do have a conscience and this is an issue I really have to speak out on.
This can't continue, these people deserve more.
-
2009-09-05 13:03:26 |76.186.16.xxx| UD - @valley
N4G is not a forum. N4G has a forum and those posters do not get paid. I don't see your point.
I looked at their post history and I have to say that it seems like a lot of work for very little money.
Like anything else in this world they have a choice themselves to accept the situation or not. I agree it is sad though.
-
2009-09-05 14:43:02 |68.222.83.xxx| RDW - So?
N4G has a lot of problems, but this idea that the contributors are somehow being exploited is ridiculous. No one forces these people to contribute to the website. I certainly don't see anyone attacking Kevin Rose for not paying contributors to Digg. If someone is interested enough in the gaming world to post as many articles as some posters do, sweet. If they make a few extra bucks along the way, awesome. Attacking the site owners, though, for setting up a successful business is ridiculous.
-
2009-09-05 20:35:47 |76.250.251.xxx| Azrael - Bwahahahah
I love how the author throws around terms like "contributor cla*s" and "ruling cla*s". N4G isn't some sort of feudal government, it's a damn news repost website. If the top 10 contributers felt they weren't being fairly compensated for REPOSTING other people's news stories then they should just stop doing it and find other means of employment. I also love how one of the methods for compensation that the author suggests is site and forum moderation privileges. If having the ability to ban someone is your idea of compensation for any work performed then it's obvious that you should be getting paid at all since it's probably against your state's child labor laws to have you working at such a young age.
Now, if these "contributors" were actually writing all of these news articles for N4G then I could understand the need to ensure they were being fairly compensated. But since N4G basically makes money by linking people to another website for news, I don't see the issue.
-
2009-09-05 20:38:21 |76.250.251.xxx| Azrael
err, that should actually be "obvious that you should not be getting paid at all".
Stupid lack of an edit button...
-
2009-09-06 07:30:59 |66.17.109.xxx| Jimmy - HAHAHA
So you just delete comments you don't like, fantastic. I'll just keep repeating it, no skin of my nose. If you have seen Bloodmask rants there is no way you would want him to have more control.
If the contribs. want just stop posting no body makes us put other peoples work on the site. If you want more money make your own damn site.
Good Night
-
2009-09-06 08:56:28 |86.145.170.xxx| Anonymous
Communist bastards. The contributors that is. They have the geeky power to control the site and make the owner a lot of money. So what. If they really wanted to make money they should build their own site.
-
Jimmy wrote:So you just delete comments you don't like, fantastic. I'll just keep repeating it, no skin of my nose. If you have seen Bloodmask rants there is no way you would want him to have more control.
If the contribs. want just stop posting no body makes us put other peoples work on the site. If you want more money make your own damn site.
Good Nightlol i did delete the comments. Just so you know BM did not write the article. Actually he did not take any part of it.
DO not believe me? read it for yourself on n4g
http://n4g.com/NewsPendingCom-389819.aspx?CT=2#Comments
look at the first comment in OPEN ZONE
and NO i generally do not go around deleting comments at all
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| Newest Articles | Most Viewed Articles |









I didn't even know they got any money, why should they? They do not produce content, they just post links to it and dont have to, so to compare it it'd be like getting paid to post on an internet forum. Do DIGG members get paid? It seems ridiculous to demand pay for posting on an entertainment site of your own choice, and to compare it to china or feudal times, just lol.